Neural Interface as Stent

As a followup to a previous blog entry, DARPA does it again.

A practical neural interface is one of the critical path components for human beings to accelerate the journey toward the full Trans-Human experience. DARPA gets it, and is about ready to start human trials of a Neural Interface for Brain stent.

The Experimental Neural Interface Brain Stent

The Experimental Neural Interface Brain Stent

Adapted from off-the-shelf stents, implanted via a relatively simple injection versus brain surgery, the stentrode experiments could set the stage for an unprecedented phase shift in technology.

The potential use cases for an easy-to-use, safe digital neural interfaces are infinite. Although the same could be said for most technology, the leverage in this case far surpasses any invention to date. By comparison, everything else is on par with, say, the screwdriver. Yes, the screwdriver is awesome. The use cases for the trusty screw driver are probably infinite — well beyond that of driving in screws or the opening of paint can lids. But I cannot command drones, read minds, leap over tall buildings in a single bound, nor levitate 10 feet off the ground using only a screwdriver. With a stentrode implant and the a network-connected assembly of the right gear, all those super powers (and many more) are but a fraction of the new possibilities in the new adjacent possible enabled by said invention.

Data Science Now

I did it! I graduated!

After nearly a year of online courses, homework, assignments, and after work projects, culminating in a final Capstone project, I completed my Data Science Certification from John Hopkins University. And the experience was awesome.

Johns Hopkins University (Coursera delivered) Data Science Specialization

Johns Hopkins University (Coursera delivered) Data Science Specialization

I highly recommend the Johns Hopkins program for any out there interested in getting their Data Science mojo down. It helps to have a strong background in programming and statistics; either graduate-level courses or a lot of industry experience. But even if you have one but not the other, I still recommend it. One of the great things about Coursera is the option to take a course for no credit at no cost to learn the material, and then go back and take the course for credit.

So that’s it. I’ve finished the program. Next comes … Hadoop Developer Certification, most likely. That should be a pretty tame set of studies compared the to the last year of R, Data Science fundamentals, and applied predictive models. With any luck I’ll have completed that goal too before the end of 2015.

My intent for 2016 is to master the tools that come with Kali Linux, help to start a satellite of Hackers and Founders in Utah, learn Spark and enough Scala to get by, and hopefully explore a Hololens or something like it.

But in the end, Data Science is the foundation upon which all the looming innovation coming our way necessarily depends.

If there’s hope for humanity, it’s in software.

Everybody say ‘Amen.’

Cognitive Prosthesis Now

what dreams may come?

what dreams may come


Can you imagine a manufactured device that can serve as a storage upgrade for your brain? Your memories off-loaded to one or more backup mirrors as needed?

No? Well such a device now appears to be in the human trials phase. According to an article in the Financial Times, our friends at DARPA have completed animal trials and are now embarking on human trials for what is effectively a cognitive prosthesis — brain implants that can accurately translate electrical signals in the brain such as to mimic wetware workflow, thus prepping signals for long term storage. The hope is to restore memory for folks otherwise impaired, which now seems plausible. Clearly the use cases extend far beyond aiding those with brain damage.

If off-loaded memories as such can be stored and accessed reliably, then how can we be from Kurzweil’s dream of complete consciousness migration to non-biological instruments?

If you can imagine some memories off-loaded, then why not all memories?

If you can imagine all memories stored in the cloud, as it were, since memories ostensibly comprise the better part of the “I AM” that is reading this, then why not your fovea of consciousness too?

So is it Kurzweil or Gelernter? I think I’m still in the Gelernter camp — “You can simulate a rainstorm, nobody gets wet.” But DARPA may yet prove Kurzweil’s predictions true.

SQL’s sequel: SQL

SQL’s been around for a long time. It’s old school. Behemoth’s like IBM, Oracle, and Microsoft are deeply committed to RDMS systems that are essentially defined by a standard, well-accepted language for access. SQL emerged in the 70s, became ANSI and ISO standards in the 80s, with SQL systems forming the backbone of Internet servers since the dawn of the Network Age.

Then along comes NoSQL … first it was “No SQL” with Carlo Strozzi’s Unix-like interface to an RDMS in the late 90s to a slew of key/value databases in the previous decade with entrants like CouchDB and MongoDB. And Column databases like HBase and Cassandra. And Graph databases like Neo4j.

But now it seems NoSQL may also mean something else. “Not YET SQL.” One of the giants in the RDMS world, Michael Stonebraker, certainly seems to think so. So, it would seem, does Teradata

presto -- one SQL to rule them all

presto — one SQL to rule them all

.

With Teredata’s recent embrace of presto it’s clear that SQL as a conceptual interface and standard language for a litany of storage choices makes good sense for a number of reasons. This is not to say that SQL will be the only choice for data access — not by a long shot. But it does mean that in case there was any doubt, SQL as a data access language and relational calculus paradigm is here to stay regardless of the structure of the underlying databases.

Want to join a hive query with some my mysql records? No problem. Cassandra with Postgres? You bet. Some JMX mixed in for good measure? No problem. It’s only a matter of simply-configured connectors to turn presto into a single point of query.

The industry has been looking for SQL’s sequel since I can remember. And now it’s here. It’s SQL. Big Data requires it, and competitive pressures demand it. Even while bringing a much-needed layer of clarity to a gnarly Big Data problem, presto helps makes SQL cool again.

Don’t Fear the Deeper

You may not have heard of Numenta. Perhaps the name Jeff Hawkins is only slightly familiar. That’s Jeff Hawkins, not to be confused with Stephen Hawking.

Hawkins is a true tech pioneer. Founder of Palm, he was instrumental in ushering in the era of the mobile network. But his life long passion with understanding the human brain has led him to his current venture: Numenta.

I wrote a series of article nearly 10 years ago which featured my thoughts on AI, the then fledgling Numenta approach, and Hawkins’ view of how AI ought to proceed. So today, when I read that IBM has now devoted a research center to explore Numenta’s AI algorithms, my curiosity was piqued — and I was, I must admit, quite pleased. Ten years ago I compared Hawkins work with that of Hugo de Garis. I found Hawkins’ thoughts on how AI must necessarily emerge to be compelling, reasonable, and quite probably correct. I read On Intelligence within a few months of publication, and have remained a student of machine learning ever since.

My wordy series, written for Java.net, can be read here in all its broken-link glory:

The Aritsan and the Artilect: part1, part2, part3.

Emergence is the thing. Take the human brain, mimic the abstracted design features in software, and allow the machine to learn. Sensory input becomes patterns becomes knowledge becomes intelligence, provided the abstract characteristics of the human intelligence processing system is accurately captured and duplicated.

But wait … aren’t we courting disaster here? Don’t we have ample cultural artifacts that caution us to not even attempt such feats, lest we surely perish? From Frankenstein to the Terminator to Ex Machina, we have been warned. Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk have signed an open letter with very stern words: AI is our greatest existential threat!

Not so, say others. Many actually involved in AI tell us we should embrace this next inevitable step in evolution. Jeff Hawkins is certainly one of them. So is Tim Oates, a professor of AI, who recently assured us that AI itself is nothing we should fear. As with any technology, read the fine print for acceptable use cases: it’s not the gun, it’s not the bullet, it’s actually the finger pulling the trigger.

Ten years ago I created the quadrant below to depict the Hawkins/de Garis ethical contrast. You should click on the image to read the section from the Artisan and the Artilect entitled The Future of AI. Ten years later, it holds up well … it’s not terrible, and I still believe it to be true.

So contratulations to Numenta! IBM will take it to the next level.

But whether Deep Blue or Deeper Blue, we have nothing to fear. Human competitive general purpose AI is emergent, which means we cannot, strictly speaking, program it. And if it does emerge, we can trust it as a natural and inevitable product of a well-designed universe — sort of like us in the best sense. Will it be conscious? Self-aware? Can it be human-like intelligent otherwise?

Those questions, perhaps, are fodder for another day.

Turing Test Passed?

If you’re a muggle, or have slept for most of the past 30 years, you may not know what the Turing Test is. If so, you should stop reading this blog immediately and find out. Try google.

So today I saw this headline from an article printed yesterday on The Independent out of the UK: Turing Test breakthrough as super-computer becomes first to convince us it’s human

I was naturally intrigued. Passing the Turing Test has been the holy grail of AI since the dawn of civilization — or at least since the dawn of the digitalli. Elation and terror ought to be the natural human response to any AI so advanced it is indistinguishable from us breathing bags of water. Carefully I clicked on the link in the article leading to the AI on the other side.

Chat with Eugene (link deprecated)

Meet Eugene Goostman, the 13 year old Ukrainian boy touted as the first to pass that most elusive test for the ages. Alas, I was disappointed.

Hardly a candidate for Turing Test master, IMHO. Clever, perhaps, but not even close to convincing. Perhaps it is a slow news day; the web-wide echo chamber has picked up the meme. I too now do so, but with less enthusiasm. Nothing to see here … move on.

On an entirely unrelated note, I have been called a poet. I’ve been called many things in my life, but not a poet — not until now.

I subscribe to The Listserve, an only mailing list/lottery of some 24K members that allows one list member to publish something to the entire list daily. So one email per day, from this group of like-minded others. The rules are simple: be interesting in fewer than 600 words.

I won last week. I had 48 hours to respond to the notice. My work was captured by a fellow Listerver and is published here. So now I have been called a poet.

Perhaps if Eugene Goostman had been a bit more poetic, I’d have been more prone to believe in him.

UDATE: 10 June 2014
Evidently the talented Mr. Goostman took exception to the copious criticisms that must have come as a result of the Turing Test claims made so recently; the site appears to be inoperative. If the broken image icon appears in the “Chat with Eugene” box above, then the site is still down. Perhaps he is resting. 🙂

Brain Implant Me!

Are you ready to take the next bold step in evolution?

If brain implants today are as far away as laser eye surgery was a couple of decades ago, it could very well be that an implanted cognitive prosthesis is in a future near you.

According to this article in the Wall Street Journal, “…before the end of the century, our computer keyboards and trackpads will seem like a joke; even Google Glass 3.0 will seem primitive. Why would you project information onto your eyes (partly occluding your view) when you could write information into your brain so your mind can directly interpret it? Why should a computer wait for you to say or type what you mean rather than anticipating your needs before you can even articulate them?”

As we embark on this frontier we simply cannot imagine nor predict the consequences. Yes, I want to increase my mental acuity. Of course I would love a perfect memory, the ability to instantly translate any foreign-language conversation, access to the entire universe of information with just the flip of a thought. Who would not want Superman-like telescoping and microscopic vision, let alone super-hearing? Got some bad memories to purge? Implants can help with that too. As a matter of fact, a litany of brain disorders might be quickly and easily dispatched once we’re into 2nd or 3rd generation brain implants.

Ah, but there is, of course, a dark side. Isn’t it always so?

If my memories can be purged, then they can also be synthesized. If my vision can be augmented, then so can my reality. Philosophically, brain implants quickly lead to an existential dilemma, akin to Chuang Chou’s butterfly dream. Which thoughts are my own? Will I be able to tell the difference? Is there such a thing as “my own thoughts” when the illusion of separation is so completely dispatched. Alas, the quandaries are legion.

But I still want it.

Network Age Eyes

The holiday season is now nearly done — with The Epiphany soon upon us, Christmas 2013 comes to a close. It’s been a wonderful holiday this year; hope yours was equally joyful. Time to now get back to work … and dream of what might be de rigueur next holiday shopping season.

I have long been a fan boy of technology. But for me the problem with technology is the shiny new toys ‘coming soon’ are always more compelling than the stuff on shelves today. Alas, what is to be usually trumps what is, so I tend to not be an early adopter. Perhaps 2014 will change that.

Innovega’s smart lenses


Augmented reality has been a vision (no pun) for decades. We may finally be near a commercially-viable solution. Check out the iOptik system from Innovega. Comfortably overlaying reality with information fields could be CES-worthy in 2014. Maybe I can ask Santa for a Bluetooth-enabled set of Network Age contact lenses under the Christmas tree this year.

Seven Steps for a Better World

The puppet show these past few weeks — the U.S. government shutdown/debt-limit drama playing on all channels — seems to have more of us than ever buying into the Us v. Them meme.

Us v. Them has been around for a very long time. You know instinctively how it works: we’re okay, they are not. We are good, they are not. We are human, they are not. I imagine the ability to easily view “them” as less than human gave “us” evolutionary advantages. A tribe that naturally harbors empathy for other is not as likely to savagely eliminate the enemy quite as easily as one who doesn’t.

So it’s ingrained in us. We, the “us” in our tribe, can easily be lead to dehumanizing “them.” Leaders do this almost instinctively – some of our leaders today seem better at it than ever before.

Anyway, that’s not the point of this missile. This particular sojourn into the mystical realm of the imaginary is in response to Shutdown Theater, to some extent. But these are ideas I have mulled over for a very long time and I figured now might be a good time to write them down and share.

As you may have discerned if you’re read anything else I’ve written over the years, I’m a big fan of the Network Age and the potential for technology to benefit our species. I coined the term “Network Age” at the dawn of this century whilst in the employ of now-defunct Sun Microsystems in a blog entry I wrote — before they were called blogs. The marketing folks at Sun soon stole the term from me — which was okay by me, but hey, a little credit maybe? Anyhow, the fact is, I’ve been touting Network Age stuff for a long time. So now I think it’s time we took a structured approach to applying Network Age technologies to the institutional models that may have worked for us up till now — but clearly require some adjustments.

These Seven Steps for a Better World all employ Network Age concepts and technologies, and will give rise to a better infrastructure within which we can all continue to live long and prosper.

Seven Steps for a Better World

1. Nationalize the Federal Reserve. If you don’t know the history or function of the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank, educate yourself. Don’t just read a Wikipedia article and think you’ve nailed it. Dig in! What do they do? Who benefits? Who specifically owns the Federal Reserve? How did they come to be? Why should we continue to abide this arrangement? If you are a rational citizen of the Network Age, I am sure you will agree with me that nationalization of the U.S. Federal Reserve is a good first step to remedy the opaque playpen riddled with financial shenanigans we have today. While we’re at it, BitCoin our currency! Again, educate yourself if you don’t know what that means.

2. Require Congress only meet via teleconference – no more face-to-face. If every Senator and every member of the House actually worked out of their home state, where they’d have to see their neighbors and speak in their cities on a daily basis, a lot less nonsense would occur. Life stream anyone at that level and all their staffs — EVERY communication while they are in public service is capture, archived, and made public. Basically, open source these processes, well beyond CSPAN. Do the same with leaders in the Executive and Judicial Branches of the government. We the people deserve to know everything our representatives do and say on our behalf. Open source government. Do this and K-Street is a ghost town. Lobbyists are extinct. Big money influence is reduced, and far fewer career politicians will be the result.

3. Flatter taxes with Guaranteed Income. Either flatten income taxes, or eliminate income tax and tax consumption only … PROVIDED a guaranteed annual income is part of the solution. Here’s a Network Age solution for taxes: Provide a tax-free $12,000 annual income for all adults (over 18) in the U.S. For the 250 million of us, the cost would be $3 trillion annually. Anything a person works for beyond that is entirely up to them, and taxed at a flat(ter) rate than today. Capital gains taxes would apply at rates about half of what they are today. If $12,000 a year isn’t enough, then figure out how to increase your income. Do that, but end all the other entitlements, period, including social security, medicare, and medicaid. Just draw the line and say no more — that’s what you get. If you want more, make a contribution. If you want to give to others, give. But simplify the benefits, simplify the tax code, eliminate the bureaucracies, and empower people to manage their own lives. The only real problem with this proposal is identity — to ensure it cannot be stolen or duplicated. But we can fix that with technology too. Give me three like-minded geeks and a weekend and we’ll come up with a design that would eliminate 99.999% of the risk in this proposal.

4. Eliminate the TSA, the EPA, and the Departments of Commerce, Education, Homeland Security. Require transportation firms to police their property. Return Federal lands to the States and let the States manage them along with their own pollution issues. Education online is fundamentally transforming human learning without any central control, thank you very much. And with Network Age technologies, coordination amongst the various intelligence agencies and defense groups is easier, not harder. The organizational problems that led to us missing 9/11 was not too little in the way of security agencies. It was too much.

5. End the Federal War on Drugs. Eliminate the DEA. If States want to criminalize drugs, let them. If States want to license and tax the sale of drugs — ANY DRUGS — let them. Don’t want driver driving high? Neither do I. But texting is just as bad and we don’t put Apple executives in jail. Besides, automated driving will soon be the norm. If people want to get high, it’s their own stupid business. The Federal War on Drugs has done nothing but create a lucrative black market that inherently corrupts and clearly yields only violence. End it.

6. End the Federal War on Terror. How about we substitute a War on Stupidity instead?

7. Enforce existing immigration laws. Don’t like the current laws? Great, then work to change them. Talk to your neighbors, and park it on the door of your reps to make your case, a process made a lot easier by Step #2.

It’s not that hard, people. We can move ‘forward’ without sacrificing the individual liberty we cherish, and without being accused of kicking anybody to the curb. Implicit in all this is a profound reduction in Federal Government reach and budget. Sure, you can argue that the $3 trillion in guaranteed income is a necessary increase. But those tax-free BitCoins will spur economic growth beyond anything we’ve seen to date. Obviously cutting huge checks to the banksters and insurance companies didn’t help. The annual distribution of currency to the masses will have a profoundly different outcome. Wall Street may not be pleased, but Main Street will be thrilled.
We have way too many departments, agencies, bureaucracies and regulations. The Us vs. Them thing will only lead to conflict. We have ample resources in this world and more to come thanks to technology. The Network Age changes everything — even fundamentally transforming governmet — if we insist on it.

Techlepathy

Yeah, just go ahead and mindtweet me. Telepath me that thought, would you? Not now, I’m telephathing!

Wasn’t it Orson Scott Card’s sequel to Ender’s Game (Speaker for the Dead) that featured a matured Ender Wiggin with a technology-based telepathic mentor? An AI that ‘spoke’ to him? His thoughts captured and transmitted via only his intent to speak? The idea was technically plausible. A form of silent thought transmission using nothing but thoughts — and a few well-crafted implants.

Sookie Stackhouse quality mind reading is now on the road map. Think the NSA has a handle on your communications now? Just wait till our very thoughts are fair game. But with brain-to-brain control tech, the Manchurian Candidate possibilities are quite legion.

Mind control in the lab

Mind control in the lab

Couple mind control (that’s actually what we’re talking about, isn’t it?) with memory engineering … and get ready to be fitted for a tin foil hat, because dude, the you don’t need a conspiracy theory to assemble the pieces of this tale! Borg? Are we embracing Borg? Will we welcome Borg like we did Big Brother?

The Era of Memory Engineering Has Arrived

There is but one existential question that remains: are we already in the Matrix?

Michio Kaku: Some have proposed using quantum entanglement (the invisible umbilical cord that exists between objects) as a form of telepathy. But there are much more practical ways of achieving telepathy that already exist. Already we can take MRI scans, EEG scans of the brain, decipher them using computers, shoot that information to another person. This is called radio-enhanced telepathy.

Kaku said that in 2011. In 2013, he is proven to be correct … and even prescient. Perhaps after technology-based telepathy, precog is next?

Just let me overclock my brain and enjoy the ride.

Top